Where have all the losers gone?

I had a ponder yesterday while watching the Grey Cup. Every year two teams play in a Championship game. This is the same for the Grey Cup, the Super Bowl, the Stanley Cup, the Calder Cup, and so on. In every sport and every game both teams have equal chance at winning. Due to this, a special team of manufacturers create hats for the winning team to wear at the moment they are crowned the champions. However, what happens to the hats and sometimes even shirts that are made for the team that loose? Sure, the team that wins have the proper clothing with the proper labels. But where in the world do the wrong labeled outfits go? Are they burned? Are they sent to a far off land where people are dressed in the wrong winners from every year? Are they donated? Do poor people never know who actually won the game? Are they buried at sea or in the desert?
To be honest, there must be a logical answer to this, but i just can't think of it. They can't all just be thrown out, can they? If someone could fill me in on where these shirts and hats have disappeared to, I would be grateful.

Give me it with sugar coating please

Lately, I have heard a lot of "tell the truth", and "be honesty". Well, to be honest, sometimes you just need to sugar coating on the truth. I like to hear a lie every now and then, especially when I know its a lie that has been told to make me feel better! It soothes me to know that they would go through the trouble of lying to me to spare my feelings. I don't appreciate a lie that is told to cover up something. However, a sugar coated truth is often needed, especially in comparison to being brutally honest. For example, that dress looks great, but how about this one? or those "boots are still in", when I can't afford anything else. But not "holy shit this is garlicy", when I'm learning to cook!
In my opinion people say something different than they want. Although I may say I want honesty and it is a desirable trait in a person, to be honest, I like the truth with a little bit of sugar coating. Not to much, just enough to take away the sting.

Advancements?

Apparently being sick and stuck on a couch all day creates a bundle of revelations about popular culture. Watching TV I have seen about a dozen "advancements" in different things. For example, detergent that "pops" throughout the day, air fresheners that sense a bad smell, or a toothpaste that does everything under the sun! My debate for these products are, why do we need them? If a scientist can put so much effort into making detergent beads that pop throughout the day to make us smell nice, than why can't these scientists devote their time to other endeavors, such as medical discoveries. I am aware that these sciences are very different. However, as children did these scientists dream of becoming the inventor of a brand new detergent? If all of these creators have the power to make these advancements in useless things, I wonder what they could all create if they worked on more detrimental things like cancer, or diabetes.
I would use no name no pop detergent if that meant that there would be more people working on these worldwide problems.

Video Games.. not just a man's world?

While watching the news at noon today there was an interesting report on the new advancement of women and video games. The report began by saying that video games are not just used by men anymore, its a women's world too. However, watching the report it was clear that this involvement is actually because of two very different reasons. Men enjoy the activity, the skill, and the challenge. Although some women do enjoy these aspects as well, by listening to the interviews and examining the information, it is evident women are interested in video games for the same reason they are interested in many other activities, the social aspect. Women quoted enjoying talking about it, getting together with friends for parties to do it and talking to people through the video games. Therefore, although women are getting involved it seems to reinforce the true nature of the differences between the genders instead of providing evidence to how they are becoming more "similar" as the report seemed to detail.

The swearing continuum

When were new rules set for swearing during prime time TV? While watching prime time TV in the past hour, I have heard "bitch", "shit" "hell" "crap" "dammit" "ignorant skank" "dirty whore" tits" and even dare I say it, "ho-bag". I wonder, was there a date recorded when the only swear word left to be used on TV was the f-word?
Although I personally am not offended by the use of these words, well maybe "ho-bag", I wonder when we decided, and what made us decide, that these words were now so socially acceptable?

Body image and the Disney Princess

There are many things I love about Disney movies. The magic, the silliness, and the imagination they can instill. However, the one thing that I can never shake is the stereotypical representations it holds. Specifically, I wanted to touch on body image, which is a big topic surrounding today's media influence. The Disney princess is beautiful, but much like the Barbie, a complete falsity and physical impossibility. Interesting to note, even in this picture, the princesses are positioned much like fashion or magazine models. Perhaps this is foreshadowing stereotypical magazines to come in the future of young girls?

The Disney princess possesses a perfect hour glass figure found attractive by the male species for reproductive purpose (as explained by the evolutionary theory). Additionally, she is well endowed, has perfectly symmetrical features, an extremely small waist size that seems to be an impossibility, and long luscious hair. Much like many cultural impressions, due to the idolization of such princesses, young girls are unfortunately influenced by these impossible ideals of beauty.
Although I direct this towards girls, it isn't to say that boys are less subject to these stereotypes. Take a look at a Disney hero for example.

The men are typically tall, with larger legs, smaller waists, larger torsos (again noted as most desirably by the evolutionary theory), along with perfectly symmetrical features, and never move an inch of hair. Therefore, young boys as well are subject to impossible standards to live up to, unless they aim for Quasi-Motto, then perhaps they can reach their Disney Hero goal.

Essentially, these types of media representations influence children at young age to believe a certain kind of beauty, Disney Princess beauty, represents the way they should look.

Second life and the removal of real life

After doing a presentation on the social media "second life" it has had me thinking about the way our world seems to be on a route of becoming more lonely, even though we have the ability of connecting with more people. The more advanced we have become in technology, the less advanced we become as social beings. If we have the technology and the tools to create a second life in which we can satisfy our consumer, business, and social desires, what will people ever need to leave the house for? Have we become a society that is too reliant on convenience? Has this taken away from our true living? Do we cause our own depression, and weight problems by continually coming up with these ways to make life "easier"?

Although second life, for example, provides amazing opportunities for business development and communication with people across the world, it is perhaps inhibiting the communication between the people in our immediate realm. Has convenience gone too far?
Is a choice between convenience in life vs really living?
Second Life: http://www.secondlife.com/